61st Baeksang Arts Awards: Fans demand disqualification of Hyeri, IU, and Kim Hye Yoon from Popularity Awards; here’s why

As the 61st Baeksang Arts Awards advance shut, a recent controversy has emerged surrounding the Popularity Awards, shaking up the fan neighborhood and raising questions referring to the integrity of the voting project. On April 23, 2025, the Baeksang Awards committee launched a 10-day voting interval by the PRIZM app, animated fans to solid their votes for the most well-preferred male and female nominees from each TV and movie categories.

Given the overwhelming participation for the length of the sixtieth Baeksang Awards in 2024, where over 11 million votes were solid, fans were waiting for one other round of intense competition. However, most modern trends suggest that the scuttle for the Popularity Awards could per chance maybe no longer be as comely because it seems.

The voting procedure allows every user to solid up to four votes per day, with the likelihood to create extra votes by sharing their voting certificates net page. The PRIZM app is a key piece of Baeksang’s interactive voting project, which affords fans an different to interact with the tournament and toughen their well-liked stars.

The pleasure surrounding the Popularity Awards grew quick, with the nominees in each categories, 35 males and 35 ladies, launched in mid-April. Among the standout nominees were actress Hyeri (Victory), singer-changed into-actress IU (When Lifestyles Affords You Tangerines), and actress Kim Hye Yoon (Intellectual Runner), all of whom luxuriate in garnered a necessary different of votes.

However, the notify took a flip when several movies surfaced on-line that appeared as if it would existing evidence of ‘macro functions,’ automated scripts conventional to manipulate voting results. These movies, that were quick shared during social media platforms, existing that sure voters had employed automated systems to amplify the vote counts for the leading female nominees. Hyeri, IU, and Kim Hye Yoon, who were already leading the scuttle with 2-3 million votes every, changed into the point of hobby of mounting hypothesis. Followers and critics alike began to establish a query as to whether or no longer these inflated numbers were the result of organic toughen or if they were artificially manipulated via automated voting.

The revelation of automated voting has ignited outrage among Baeksang fans, especially folks that peek the Popularity Awards as a technique to luxuriate in a neutral correct time the categorical admiration of the final public. Many are calling for the disqualification of the tip three nominees (Hyeri, IU, and Kim Hye Yoon) if the notify of automated voting is confirmed. A in sort belief emerged that the notify of macros had undermined the equity of the competition, casting doubt on the authenticity of the outcomes. Many luxuriate in known as the notify disgraceful and suggested that the award could per chance maybe aloof be abolished altogether.

Followers were left questioning why the Baeksang Awards had no longer done stronger measures to forestall the manipulation of voting via macros. The controversy has escalated to the point where fans are now calling into attach a query as to whether or no longer the Popularity Award could per chance maybe aloof even continue to be piece of the Baeksang ceremony.

As the voting interval continues, the Baeksang Awards committee has yet to area an respectable commentary primarily primarily based on the allegations of voting manipulation. The silence from the committee has most efficient fueled extra discontent, with fans annoying quick action to address the rising concerns.