Home Korean News ADOR’s Min Hee Jin sues HYBE’s Park Ji Won and 4 other executives for defamation and illegally acquiring personal data; Report

ADOR’s Min Hee Jin sues HYBE’s Park Ji Won and 4 other executives for defamation and illegally acquiring personal data; Report

by Liza Terry
Crime Scene returns: Netflix announces new season of popular Korean variety mystery show

ADOR’s Min Hee Jin sues HYBE’s Park Ji Won and 4 other executives for defamation and illegally acquiring personal data; Report

ADOR's CEO Min Hee Jin reportedly recordsdata a police complaint in opposition to HYBE's CEO Park Ji Received and other executives for defamation and other charges.

Min Hee Jin, HYBE: HYBE's web page online
Min Hee Jin, HYBE: HYBE's web page online

On this Article

ADOR’s Min Hee Jin sued HYBE’s CEO Park Ji Received and other firm executives for defamation and illegally purchasing private files in accordance to fresh reviews. The feud between Min Hee Jin and HYBE has been happening for months now and the case retains escalating. Right here are the diminutive print of the unique tendencies.

Min Hee Jin recordsdata police complaint in opposition to HYBE executives

In accordance to reviews on July 24 by 10 Asia, ADOR’s CEO Min Hee Jin sued HYBE executives, together with Park Ji Received, faded CEO of HYBE, on charges of defamation and purchasing files illegally. ADOR released an legit assertion whereby they said that a manual of Min Hee Jin and others had submitted a complaint to Yongsan Police Location in opposition to the HYBE officers.

The complaint has been filed in opposition to HYBE’s faded CEO Park Ji Received, audit committee chairman Lim Soo Hyun, chief licensed officer Jung Jin Soo, chief financial officer Lee Kyung Joon, and chief verbal substitute officer Park Tae Hee. Costs filed in opposition to them are for obstruction of industrial, detection of contents similar to digital files, promoting the exercise of files and verbal substitute networks, and records security.

Costs filed in opposition to HYBE executives in detail

ADOR claimed that the defendants delight in leaked illegally got text communications and private files without permission, and delight in made unfaithful edits. They extra defined that the defendants forcibly got the ADORE-owned industrial notebook computer inclined by the complainants in April below the name of ‘audit of subsidiaries of the parent firm’ and illegally got private conversations.

They added that the defendants inclined the non-public conversations to manufacture unfavorable public idea about Min Hee Jin by editing and distorting facts and attempting to defame her.

Min Hee Jin’s manual extra said that they officially and informally requested the defendants to stay this several cases, but the defendants’ illegal activities delight in persisted. Subsequently, they’ve chosen to steal licensed steps as they’ll now no longer neglect the damage to artists and participants of ADORE.

Source credit : pinkvilla

Related News