‘See you in court’: Former ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin fails to attend mediation trial in sexual harassment coverup case; accuser demands apology

Min Hee Jin is in sizzling water again after she did now not encourage the mediation trial for a used ADOR employee’s defamation lawsuit in opposition to her. The particular individual previously accused her of covering up a office harassment case and filed a 100 million KRW lawsuit. Later, the case proceeded to settlement.

In retaining with updates on January 6, the Seoul Western District Court docket held the first mediation date for a used ADOR employee’s defamation lawsuit in opposition to Min Hee Jin. Nonetheless, she used to be allegedly absent from the trial. The accuser took to her Instagram and shared a story clarifying that although she attended the mediation, Min Hee Jin used to be absent and handiest her appropriate staff used to be there. “The opposite birthday celebration stated that they’d maybe well well now not accept a single thing, so no mediation used to be reached. Witness you in court docket,” the particular individual wrote.

Meanwhile, Okay-media reviews additionally confirmed the same. It has been reported that the ex-ADOR employee (known as A) stated that if Min Hee Jin admits to her wrongdoings, her facet is willing to attain a settlement no matter the amount. They additionally demanded an apology from her for her unilateral actions of taking aspects and disclosing inner most conversations with out permission. Nonetheless, at some stage within the trial, Min Hee Jin’s facet made it sure they had no diagram of mediation.

For the unversed, earlier in 2024, Particular person A claimed that she used to be sexually pressured by the used vp of ADOR when she used to be detached working at the firm. She reported it to Min Hee Jin but obtained no abet. As an alternative, the used ADOR CEO took the VP’s facet, known as her accusation false, and publicly criticized her work capacity. In August, the girl filed a 100 million KRW lawsuit in opposition to her with the Mapo Police Situation for defamation and violation of the Private Info Protection Act.