Min Hee Jin claims HYBE failed to justify her contract termination at 2nd court hearing amid NewJeans’ ADOR feud

Min Hee Jin, extinct CEO of ADOR, has in a roundabout blueprint spoken out in accordance to the continuing correct war with HYBE. This marks the first public assertion regarding the lawsuit over the termination of her shareholder agreement with HYBE. On April 17 at 2:00 PM KST, the Thirty first Civil Affairs Division of the Seoul Central District Court docket held the 2nd listening to filed by HYBE against Min Hee Jin.

Min Hee Jin’s correct crew, Sejong Legislation Firm, made a plucky assertion addressing the continuing dispute. The extinct ADOR CEO asserts that HYBE lacks correct grounds for terminating her contract. She claims the option became as soon as made all of sudden, with the company failing to present any proper proof. The dispute intensifies amid ongoing tensions between NewJeans (NJZ) and ADOR.

Min Hee Jin’s facet said, “This pertains to the case regarding the affirmation of the termination of the shareholders’ agreement, which proceeded on the present time. Min Hee Jin’s correct marketing consultant has already submitted written arguments twice, refuting the unjust grounds for termination claimed by HYBE. Rather, it is HYBE that has didn’t present any rebuttal regarding the illegality of the termination watch, among assorted substances raised by Min Hee Jin’s facet.”

HYBE, on the quite quite so much of hand, argues that the agreement became as soon as already terminated by the time of her dismissal, citing their correct to prevent such agreements with written watch. They claim the formula to fire Min Hee Jin became as soon as made independently by ADOR’s board and had no converse involvement from HYBE. The lawsuit, therefore, centers on confirming whether or now no longer the termination became as soon as legally accurate.

Min Hee Jin’s correct crew didn’t aid again, asserting that HYBE has but to substantiate their claims. They argue that HYBE didn’t present sufficient proof to present an explanation for the termination watch and accused the corporate of attempting to shift the burden of proof onto Min Hee Jin’s facet.

In a press originate, Sejong Legislation Firm emphasized that they’d already submitted arguments twice, detailing why they deem HYBE’s termination claims are unjust. Additionally they renowned that HYBE had easiest submitted additional documents in the times leading as much as the court listening to and said that the correct crew is able to retort with their rebuttals.

Min Hee Jin’s facet also said, “HYBE submitted three additional written documents on April 11, April 14, and April 15—lower than per week earlier than the listening to date on April 17. We are able to, of direction, post rebuttal briefs in response. It goes to be renowned that the burden of proof on this lawsuit lies with HYBE. In assorted phrases, HYBE must existing whether or now no longer the shareholders’ agreement became as soon as validly terminated via their termination watch.”

Min Hee Jin’s facet shares, “HYBE has made statements suggesting they might be able to easiest post detailed evidentiary documents after Min Hee Jin’s facet refutes their claims.”

The Min Hee Jin and HYBE ongoing correct combat looks to be perpetually, this can be attention-grabbing to glimpse the highest result. Till then, protect tuned.