Ex-THE BOYZ’s Ju Haknyeon cleared as police drop misconduct case involving AV star, find out why

Ju Haknyeon, aged member of THE BOYZ, has been cleared of any instantaneous lawful investigation. This update follows most up-to-date allegations of misconduct that precipitated a wave of public scrutiny. The controversy in a roundabout intention led to his departure from the neighborhood.

On July 2, the Seoul Gangnam Police Train officially confirmed that a criticism filed against him in June has been brushed apart. The case revolved spherical rumors that started circulating on-line in Could perhaps per chance 2025.

Reports claimed that Ju Haknyeon had met with Kirara Asuka, a aged Japanese grownup video actress, at a deepest lounge in Tokyo. Though no formal fees had been ever filed, the hypothesis surrounding the difficulty escalated like a flash. It introduced about his company to hiss his unexpected withdrawal from the neighborhood and the termination of his unfamiliar contract.

Ju Haknyeon denies misconduct claims

Within the weeks that adopted the initial reports, Ju Haknyeon broke his silence to disclaim the allegations completely. He maintained that there had been no “illegal activity” all the intention by his time in Japan. He expressed incompatibility with the company’s technique to full his contract.

He extra published that he had now now not agreed to trot away THE BOYZ. Ju mentioned his intent to pursue lawful stream against those that unfold what he described as unverified and defamatory files. His public stance reignited debate amongst fans and netizens. They questioned whether or now now not his departure had been voluntary or a compelled exit in accordance with media pressure.

Complaint brushed apart on account of lack of proof

A proper criticism concerning the rumors used to be submitted on June 19. It requested an reliable investigation into Ju Haknyeon. Nonetheless, after reviewing the criticism, police determined that there used to be no basis for lawful stream.

In step with statements from the Seoul Gangnam Police, the criticism used to be largely in accordance with an on-line article. It lacked the concrete runt print or corroborating proof crucial to clarify an investigation. With no huge grounds or yell proof, the authorities brushed apart the case completely. They clarified that merely referencing media protection does now now not meet the criteria required for a criminal investigation.

Accuser responds to police option

The person that filed the criticism voiced disappointment in the police’s option. They argued that other high-profile cases in the past had moved forward in accordance with media reports. In step with them, presumably the most up-to-date case could per chance perhaps mute had been handled with the identical stage of seriousness.

“I’d handle to form it sure that since the authorities bear now now not determined that the accusation is fraudulent, it does now now not meet the lawful necessities for a fraudulent accusation,” the complainant added.

The police’s option now to now not transfer forward with the case could per chance perhaps supply some closure from a lawful standpoint. Nonetheless, the impact of the controversy on his profession remains predominant.