Ex-ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin found guilty of workplace harassment and biased investigation against ex-employee; know more

Min Hee Jin, the old CEO of ADOR, has been fined by South Korea’s Ministry of Employment and Labor after a formal investigation learned that she had engaged in place of work harassment against a old worker. This dedication comes after months of public controversy surrounding her leadership at ADOR and her ongoing appropriate fight with HYBE, the guardian company of the imprint.

The ruling, which became as soon as disclosed on March 24 thru a checklist by Ten Asia, marks a predominant appropriate setback for Min Hee Jin, who has consistently denied the allegations. However, the labor ministry’s findings verify that some of her actions were unlawful, contradicting her outdated claims of innocence.

In accordance to the Ministry of Employment and Labor’s investigation, Min Hee Jin’s remedy of the complainant, known as ‘A,’ in October and December 2023 exceeded the limits of acceptable place of work habits. The ministry sure that her repeated remarks and actions against ‘A’, an ex-ADOR worker, resulted in emotional and psychological injure, which in turn contributed to a antagonistic work ambiance.

The ruling specified that the nature of Min’s interactions with ‘A’ went previous the expectations of a legitimate place of work relationship. Her words and actions were deemed immoral to the extent that they negatively affected the worker’s psychological and physical effectively-being, leading the labor ministry to categorise them as place of work harassment.

In accordance to those findings, the labor ministry imposed a elegant on Min. While the particular quantity of the penalty has now not been publicly disclosed, below South Korean labor licensed guidelines, primarily the most elegant for place of work harassment violations is 5 million KRW (approximately 3,410 USD). The labor self-discipline of job’s dedication signifies that Min’s actions were regarded as severe sufficient to warrant financial penalties as an different of a straightforward warning.

Besides to the place of work harassment charges, the investigation also learned Min accountable for interfering in an internal probe connected to one more harassment case at ADOR. The complainant, ‘A,’ had previously reported old ADOR Vice CEO ‘B’ for place of work harassment, alleging that Min did now not tackle the peril reasonably.

The labor self-discipline of job’s checklist revealed that Min actively tried to steer the investigation process. She allegedly contacted ‘B’ to demand of private messages connected to the case, potentially affecting the integrity of the inquiry. Furthermore, she became as soon as learned to private described the accusations against ‘B’ as “one-sided and biased” when speaking with one more ADOR executive known as ‘C.’

These actions were deemed a violation of Min’s responsibility as a company chief to carry out sure every person internal investigations were performed reasonably and with out bias. The labor self-discipline of job concluded that her interference within the process became as soon as immoral and played a feature in extra worsening the working ambiance at ADOR. Following the labor ministry’s ruling, ‘A’ publicly shared a summary of the case dedication, confirming that Min had been learned responsible of place of work harassment and of failing to conduct an aim investigation.

“Min Hee Jin’s place of work harassment (at the side of verbal abuse) became as soon as confirmed, and she became as soon as fined accordingly. The identified share of place of work harassment became as soon as 12%, and the elegant imposed is a predominant stage of sanction, going previous a straightforward warning,” they acknowledged.

Of their observation, ‘A’ expressed gratitude against those that had supported them at some stage within the process and emphasised that they had given Min more than one probabilities to secure to the backside of the peril amicably. They claimed to private offered her a minimal of four alternatives to mission an apology and keep an discontinuance to the matter, nonetheless Min had refused and as a replace chosen to pursue appropriate action against them.

The old worker also addressed their ongoing appropriate fight, declaring that they would proceed to defend themselves in both civil and felony cases, at the side of the lawsuit Min filed against them. ‘A’ extra effectively-known that whereas place of work harassment allegations against the old vice CEO were confirmed, separate accusations of sexual harassment were deemed inconclusive by the labor ministry, and no extra penalties were imposed for those claims.