Ex-ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin appeals court’s ‘unjust’ guilty ruling in workplace bullying case against employee

Min Hee Jin, the average CEO of ADOR, used to be declared guilty of place of work bullying by South Korea’s Ministry of Employment and Labor on March 25. The prices had been levied against her by a typical employee of the company. Following the court docket ruling against her, Min Hee Jin expressed dissatisfaction regarding it, and her merely workers declared fighting lend a hand, as reported by K-media Monthly Chosun on March 25. They’ll self-discipline the court docket resolution via merely device.

Min Hee Jin’s lawyers contested the ruling, citing errors and inaccuracies. They alleged that necessary info had been misinterpreted and that the court docket misapplied authorized suggestions connected to place of work bullying, including non-compliance with the Labor Requirements Act. Their observation read, “Upon reviewing the response regarding the going via of the case, it used to be confirmed that the info surrounding the remarks that had been sure to be place of work bullying had been incorrectly acknowledged.”

The observation extra read, “There used to be a misunderstanding of the merely rules of the Labor Requirements Act regarding place of work bullying and the accountability of intention investigation.” To refute the alleged unsuitable ruling, the ex-ADOR CEO’s merely workers plans to “proceed with formal appeal procedures, akin to promptly submitting opinions to the govt. company, to advise the explicit truth of the case and particular the unjust accusations.” Moreover that, in addition they addressed the distance with the media coverage

Primarily based mostly on their observation to Monthly Chosun, Min Hee Jin’s representatives renowned that while the Ministry of Employment and Labor’s resolution to honest her and the management designate used to be now not but finalized, sure reports gave the influence that the resolution used to be absolute and may possibly possibly now not be contested. They urged the journalists to “discontinuance spreading unsuitable data and comply with the privacy protection rules.” Additionally they talked about that if same incidents recur, they’ll be compelled to “be conscious of acceptable measures.”

The case originated when a typical ADOR employee, most regularly known as B, accused Min Hee Jin of place of work harassment and biased going via of a sexual harassment case provocative one other govt. The allegations had been raised by B in August of last 365 days, prompting an investigation by the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Place of work.