Ex-BIGBANG’s T.O.P’s alleged ex-girlfriend claims IU charges USD 500K to spend time with people; fans urge singer to sue

Loved singer-songwriter and actress IU has been unwillingly swept correct into a tense controversy. No longer too lengthy ago, sensational and unverified claims had been made about her for the duration of an episode of a podcast. The episode in quiz, launched by Above The Impact, featured a customer who made courageous accusations about the alleged presence of escort-love arrangements at some level of the Good enough-pop industry. Shockingly, she conventional IU as an instance in a single in every of her claims.

The client became once an influencer who launched herself as Kira. She alleged that she became once once in a relationship with T.O.P, a conventional member of BIGBANG. She additional claimed for the duration of her appearance that some top-tier female celebrities in South Korea had been all for secretive, transactional relationships with grand and prosperous men.

Look the podcast clip pointing out IU here:

With out presenting any proof or verifiable info, Kira went on to declare that leisure companies facilitated such arrangements. She suggested that if somebody became once prosperous enough, “love a Chinese language businessman,” they’re going to moreover simply “lumber to those leisure companies and quiz spending a night time, even with top Good enough-Pop stars.”

Though Kira did no longer accuse IU of any assert involvement, she conventional the singer’s name while providing an alleged “example” of pricing. She claims that spending a night time with IU might possibly well perhaps value as a lot as 500,000 USD. The informal and speculative system for the duration of which she introduced up IU’s name without lengthen triggered backlash. Followers and netizens criticize the podcast for platforming such statements without scrutiny or responsibility.

Followers erupt in fury over defamatory claims

IU, whose valid name is Lee Ji Eun, has lengthy been identified for her impeccable reputation, philanthropic efforts, and orderly public image at some level of her career. She has remained one in every of South Korea’s most respected and admired figures in leisure. For such a reputation to be inserted into an inaccurate and sensationalized conversation vexed many and sparked instant uproar online.

Social media platforms had been rapidly flooded with messages from IU’s followers, is believed as Uaenas. They’re annoying that simply motion be taken. Many identified that even speculative feedback, when tied to a public figure, can derive serious penalties. Followers known as for EDAM Leisure, IU’s company, to step in with a grand simply response. They desire no longer finest to protect IU’s image however moreover to ship a message about the penalties of spreading unsubstantiated rumors.

Meanwhile, this is no longer the fundamental time the belief of ‘sponsorships’ has been mentioned in Good enough-pop circles. It’s far a euphemism conventional to yelp alleged transactional relationships between celebrities and prosperous people. While some previous instances derive spicy legal investigations and simply court cases, the reckless revival of such narratives without proof or context poses an real threat to artists’ reputations.

Citing IU, one in every of the industry’s most respected and scandal-free figures, as an alleged example has crossed a line for plenty of viewers. As of now, EDAM Leisure has no longer launched an official observation concerning the incident. Nonetheless, given the magnitude of public reaction and the seriousness of the claims, many judge a response might possibly well moreover simply soon say.