BLACKPINK’s Jennie wins defamation lawsuit against fake father, here’s how Korean man made claims in unverified book
BLACKPINK’s Jennie wins a genuine case against a man who falsely claimed to be her father. Court docket orders book destruction, bans all future references, and sides fully with the idol.
BLACKPINK’s Jennie has won a main genuine fight to give protection to her private identification and reputation. A South Korean court dominated decisively in her settle on after a man (usually known as ‘A’) falsely claimed to be her organic father. He went on to post an AI-generated novel exploiting that lie.
Court docket announces claims fraudulent
On May perhaps perhaps 9, 2025, the Uijeongbu District Court docket’s Goyang Branch issued its unswerving verdict. The court stated, “There is rarely a supporting evidence for the defendant’s claim rather than his dangle statements.” The defendant didn’t offer any documentary evidence, DNA tests, or a genuine or organic link to Jennie.
Meanwhile, Jennie’s family registry, an unswerving govt doc, clearly listed a dawdle particular particular person as her father. “It is therefore cheap to originate that the defendant’s claim is flawed,” the court stated in its ruling. It also acknowledged the misery completed to Jennie’s reputation.
They cite the unfold of misleading narrate material and fraudulent rumors as detrimental. As a result, the court ordered all existing copies of the book to be eradicated from circulation and destroyed. Moreover, the defendant used to be prohibited from making any references to Jennie in future books, on messaging apps love KakaoTalk, in interviews, or on social media.
Though the ruling sided firmly with Jennie, the court did no longer impose a financial excellent-looking out or allow provisional enforcement. They critical that the case did no longer involve a correct away property dispute or financial claim. Nevertheless, the defendants had been ordered to dangle the rotund mark of genuine court cases.
Fabricated paternity sparks genuine battle
The controversy began quietly but escalated snappy when A self-printed a book prominently that contains Jennie’s name and even her logo. The prologue went so some distance as to deliver that Jennie used to be the creator’s organic daughter. The radical, though synthetic in each invent and storytelling, used to be generated the use of AI.
It circulated amongst sure on-line communities. It ended in trendy hypothesis about Jennie’s upbringing, her family’s supposed wealth, and fake tales.
Jennie, identified for being within most about her private existence, especially when it comes to her family, took the topic seriously. In September 2024, her company, OA Entertainment, issued a public commentary revealing that they might maybe be pursuing genuine motion.
Agency recordsdata lawsuit against creator
Three months later, in December 2024, OA Entertainment adopted by with its promise. They filed a proper injunction at the Uijeongbu District Court docket, Goyang Branch. The lawsuit named each the man in the assist of the fraudulent claims and his affiliated publishing company as co-defendants.
The aim of the lawsuit used to be no longer finest to limit additional distribution of the e-newsletter. It used to be also to impose genuine restrictions on the defendant’s capability to keep up a correspondence about Jennie in due direction.
Source credit : pinkvilla