Home Korean News HYBE files objection to Min Hee Jin’s non-indictment, cites court’s stance on ‘intentional disruption’ of ADOR’s structure

HYBE files objection to Min Hee Jin’s non-indictment, cites court’s stance on ‘intentional disruption’ of ADOR’s structure

by Liza Terry
V gets cozy on Jungkook’s lap, shares BTS’ gym session peek and another look at Vatman vs Ninjakook in new update

HYBE files objection to Min Hee Jin’s non-indictment, cites court’s stance on ‘intentional disruption’ of ADOR’s structure

Min Hee Jin cleared of breach of belief charges by police. Nevertheless, HYBE pushes wait on with correct objections, citing contemporary traits and court findings. Read extra here!

Min Hee Jin: Courtesy of HYBE Mark
Min Hee Jin: Courtesy of HYBE Mark

The continuing vitality combat between HYBE and faded ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin has taken one other main turn. On July 15, the Yongsan Police Attach of residing in Seoul concluded its year-prolonged investigation into Min Hee Jin. They announced that she would possibly perchance well perchance furthermore no longer be indicted on occupational breach of belief charges. The police certain there used to be no evidence of prison job within the allegations brought forward by HYBE.

Nevertheless, HYBE is no longer accepting the selection quietly. The firm has stated its intent to formally trouble the tip result. The company published that it has already submitted an objection to the prosecution.

HYBE argues that so much of traits hang taken discipline since the customary grievance. These consist of the continuing contract dispute bright the contributors of NewJeans. The firm also claims that contemporary supporting evidence has been submitted all over linked correct court cases and should always tranquil be taken into legend.

HYBE maintains allegations in opposition to Min Hee Jin

HYBE first and predominant filed a grievance in opposition to Min in April 2024. The company accused her of making an strive to take administration of ADOR, a HYBE subsidiary and the place within the wait on of NewJeans, in violation of her tasks as CEO. Min, nonetheless, continuously denied these claims. She pointed out that HYBE, which holds an 80% stake in ADOR, remains in fats administration of the firm’s construction and governance.

The battle escalated after Min raised plagiarism concerns bright ILLIT, a rookie community under BELIFT LAB, one other HYBE subsidiary. Min claimed that NewJeans’ ideas had been copied. She stated her complaints precipitated a retaliatory audit by HYBE, which within the ruin sparked the continuing correct feud.

Now, HYBE claims that further evidence has been submitted all over linked court cases. It prompted the appellate court to take a stern stance on Min Hee Jin’s behavior. The Seoul Excessive Court, which is coping with the injunction, reportedly assessed that Min “is in a discipline of intentionally destroying the integrated construction that used to be the premise of the unparalleled contract.” In response, HYBE has announced plans to enchantment the non-indictment by a proper objection.

HYBE responds to dismissals of different complaints

As well to to Min’s case, the police hang also determined no longer to forward so much of different linked complaints bright HYBE and its affiliates. Amongst the brushed apart cases were:

  • Defamation and fraudulent accusation charges filed by Min Hee Jin in opposition to BELIFT LAB’s administration and inventive crew
  • Accusations by the fan community Crew Bunnies in opposition to BELIFT LAB executives for defamation
  • A grievance by Dolphiners Movies CEO Shin Woo Seok in opposition to ADOR’s present leadership

In every instance, authorities dominated that there had been no grounds to pursue prison charges. They either cite an absence of evidence or resolve that statements made by HYBE would possibly perchance well perchance furthermore be viewed as being within the public passion and no longer supposed to defame.

HYBE emphasized that its actions, including inner audits and statements, were performed by just channels and weren’t made with malicious intent. Primarily basically based completely on the company, even non-public messages cited in complaints were bought legally all over formal inner procedures.

Source credit : pinkvilla

Related News