Home Korean News Judge says NewJeans’ breach of trust claims against ADOR are an ‘abstract concept’: ‘It’s a special case’

Judge says NewJeans’ breach of trust claims against ADOR are an ‘abstract concept’: ‘It’s a special case’

by Liza Terry
Kim Soo Hyun denies 5 evidences of dating minor Kim Sae Ron: From butt n*ked rendezvous to ski trip selfie

Judge says NewJeans’ breach of trust claims against ADOR are an ‘abstract concept’: ‘It’s a special case’

At some stage in NewJeans and ADOR's first trial, the think acknowledged after hearing each and every parties that here is a special case and printed that the have faith discipline spirited NewJeans is an abstract thought.

NewJeans: Credit rating NewJeans Instagram
NewJeans: Credit rating NewJeans Instagram

The court docket used to be anxious on April 3, 2025, as the lengthy-anticipated appropriate fight between ADOR and NJZ (previously NewJeans) officially started. At stake? The validity of the team’s intriguing contract—a dispute fueled by allegations of betrayal, forced leadership changes, and a total breakdown of have faith. The think going through the case found NJZ’s breakdown of have faith discipline an ‘abstract thought.’

Before the trial even started, the presiding think posed a necessary query: “Used to be there any probability of a settlement?” ADOR, reputedly eager to rep to the bottom of the topic, expressed hope for an agreement. But NJZ’s representatives delivered a agency response—given the emotional toll on the team, “they form now not seem like in a situation to assign in tips an agreement at the moment.”

After hearing all facets, Chief Settle Jung Hoe Il renowned that this case differed from others he had presided over. He remarked, “I essentially like dealt with many conditions where idols sought contract termination attributable to financial disputes, however this situation is odd. The breakdown of have faith is an abstract thought—each and every particular particular person perceives it in every other procedure. I will favor to fastidiously assign in tips straightforward ideas to formulation this case.”

At some stage within the trial, ADOR printed that NJZ had previously acknowledged to boot they may be able to impartial now not continue their actions without aged CEO Min Hee Jin. Alternatively, their actions—equivalent to continuing performances and making independent choices—contradicted this claim.

NJZ, on the opposite hand, argued that their predominant clarification for terminating the contract used to be the shortcoming of have faith. They claimed that Min Hee Jin used to be forcibly eliminated by the administration agency, which then replaced her with a contemporary team whose values and ethics differed vastly. This, they argued, made it very now not going for NJZ to continue working under ADOR or stay connected to HYBE. ADOR countered these claims, citing that Min Hee Jin left the corporate of her have faith accord. They also refuted NJZ’s assertion that HYBE harboured hostility toward the team, calling the allegation baseless.

As news of the trial spread, netizens snappily took facets, with opinions sharply divided. Many online discussions echoed Settle Jung Hoe Il’s sentiment relating to the contract dispute, which is rooted in a subjective thought esteem have faith. Some even speculated that the think himself may perchance perchance perchance need been pissed off by the nature of the case. FYI, the 2d trial is scheduled for April 5, 2025.

Source credit : pinkvilla

Related News