Kang Daniel’s defamation lawsuit against Sojang referred to mediation after appealing initial ‘lenient’ ruling
The court has referred mediation for Kang Daniel's defamation lawsuit in opposition to malicious YouTuber Sojang. Beforehand, his company appealed the court's lenient verdict. Read on!
Kang Daniel initially emerged victorious in his lawsuit in opposition to Ms. Park, the girl within the relief of the problematic YouTube channel Sojang. The court has ordered her to pay 30 million KRW. On the opposite hand, his lawful group stumbled on the ruling ‘unacceptably lenient’ and filed for an appeal.
In accordance to K-media experiences on January 3, the 5-2 Civil Division of the Seoul Central District Court docket referred the case to mediation. It be a lawful path of where each parties are required to solve the lawsuit via mutual notion.
Beforehand on November 27, Civil Division 29 of the Seoul Central District Court docket dominated within the K-pop idol’s prefer. Defendant A Ms. Park used to be ordered to pay 30 million KRW in damages. The court gave the verdict after acknowledging the total costs filed in opposition to her including severe ruin to Kang Daniel’s recognition and creation of malicious movies.
On the opposite hand, his company ARA and his lawful group from Law Company LIU stumbled on the ruling ‘unacceptably lenient’. They acknowledged that given the gravity of Ms. Park’s unlawful actions and its prolonged enact on the singer’s recognition, the punishment will have to were harsher.
They filed for an entice the court’s verdict. ARA acknowledged, “No topic whether or no longer the shameless defendant appeals, we can file a civil lawsuit for 100 million obtained individually from the prison path of. Here’s the minimal defensive measure to stop to any extent additional harmless victims and stop this from taking place all as soon as more.”
Kang Daniel’s group has refused to settle for the verdict of the first trial so attention is on whether or no longer they’re going to conform to the mediation.
Meanwhile, all the tactic via the sentencing hearing, Sojang requested for leniency claiming that she had no plot of hurting the K-pop idol and that she wasn’t attentive to the positive bet she circulated being faux.
On the opposite hand, the court pointed out that she had failed to supply her supply of this wrong knowledge and made no effort to tell it either. Even though she claimed to recognize uploaded the movies for the ‘public passion’, all the tactic via the trial, Ms. Park confirmed no remorse for her actions and made incomprehensible excuses.
Meanwhile, other than Kang Daniel, IVE’s Wonyoung, BTS’ V, Jungkook, and aespa’s Karina also filed defamation court cases in opposition to Sojang.
Source credit : pinkvilla