Kim Sae Ron case: FBI probes attempted murder of New Jersey informant holding voice recording against Kim Soo Hyun

Kim Sae Ron’s reveal recording has stirred well-known controversy over over again, this time generating a namely intense response as a result of the sensitive nature of its bellow material. The focal point of the conversation facilities around allegations of physical intimacy with actor Kim Soo Hyun at a after all younger age.

On Might 7, Garosero Assessment Institute, led by CEO Kim Se Eui, published aesthetic exiguous print about an informant who turned into allegedly focused in a brutal attack. This whistleblower, in possession of a recording tied to the slow actress, turned into reportedly stabbed 9 instances in a violent assault, with the institute describing the incident as a “sure act of incitement to homicide.”

The investigation into this attack has now been taken over by the FBI (U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation), rather then native authorities in New Jersey, including further gravity to the case. No real commentary has but been made by U.S. law enforcement or these named in the claims.

A press convention turned into held in Gangnam, Seoul, the ethical representatives of Kim Sae Ron’s household, including lawyer Boo Ji Seok from Buyu Laws Firm, were expose. They published that although they initially planned to give an clarification for the files after the presidential election, they made up our minds to take the step basically based completely on the character of the Kim Sae Ron-Kim Soo Hyun scandal.

Per Kim Se Eui, about a month earlier than her demise, Kim Sae Ron confided in a whistleblower residing in New Jersey. She shared that she had been mistreated by actor Kim Soo Hyun and “Leisure President Lee Jin Ho.” The whistleblower recorded a 90-minute conversation with her, reportedly with her consent.

On April 30, the whistleblower turned into allegedly attacked by two men—one from Korea and one from China—and turned into stabbed 9 instances in the neck. Kim Se Eui described the attack as a premeditated strive on his existence.

Fearing further anxiety, the whistleblower’s (in most cases known as Mr. A) household requested that parts of the recording be launched. Mr. A’s well-known other said that the attackers knew private exiguous print about their household. Nevertheless, Goldmedalist has denied these claims, calling the reveal recording fabricated and AI-generated. The agency also labeled the whistleblower a fraudulent particular particular person and a fraud.