Kim Sae Ron’s death: YouTuber Lee Jin Ho reacts to her father’s cyberbullying allegations; says, ‘My intention was to…’

The controversy surrounding the unhurried actress Kim Sae Ron has taken a new flip as YouTuber Lee Jin Ho publicly addressed allegations that his protection performed a unbiased in the hardships she faced. Amid rising scrutiny, Lee launched an announcement on his YouTube channel Leisure President Lee Jin Ho on March 10, firmly denying accusations that he had careworn her grieving family or acted irresponsibly in his reporting.

His response comes after Ilgan Sports printed an interview with Kim Sae Ron’s father, by which he blamed YouTubers like Lee Jin Ho and sensationalist media retail outlets for the extensive struggling his daughter persisted earlier than her tragic passing. In an wide video assertion, Lee refuted deal of the claims made in opposition to him, clarifying his actions, explaining his decision to contact the actress’s family, and declaring that his protection had been accountable and ethical.

Lee Jin Ho opened his video by acknowledging the bother of Kim Sae Ron’s family and expressing his condolences whereas addressing the ongoing controversy. He talked about he had read the Ilgan Sports interview with Kim Sae Ron’s family and expressed his deep remorse that they were mild being discussed in the media following her passing. He conveyed his heartfelt condolences to them as soon as extra.

On the other hand, he made it certain that he took notify with the manner Ilgan Sports had reported on the subject, declaring that their articles were in step with a “one-sided” tale. He furthermore strongly denied allegations that he had continually contacted Kim Sae Ron’s father, announcing, “I on no tale contacted the bereaved family for the period of the mourning period,” as quoted by Kbizoom.

A necessary reduce of the controversy stemmed from claims that Lee had made a pair of calls to Kim Sae Ron’s father, supposedly harassing him for the period of an already painful time. In response, Lee clarified that he before the entirety even handed as attending the funeral to give his condolences nonetheless made up our minds in opposition to it, fearing that his presence could perchance presumably add to the family’s damage, in particular after an interview had already been made public. As a change, he selected to realize out supreme after the funeral had concluded.

Lee confirmed that he made three phone calls to Kim Sae Ron’s father on February 19, nonetheless supreme after her burial had taken grunt. He framed these calls as an strive to give a “lawful apology” for any damage his past reporting could perchance presumably contain precipitated. “On February 19, after her burial, I known as her father thrice. No matter the conditions, my diagram was as soon as to give a ‘lawful apology’ for having covered deliver related to the deceased.”

Lee Jin Ho visited Kim Sae Ron’s burial spot in Paju on February 21, supreme to be taught from cemetery officers that her resting grunt had been moved a day earlier, on February 20.

His makes an are trying at reaching out, on the different hand, were met with frigid responses. Lee Jin Ho stated that for the period of their first conversation, Kim Sae Ron’s father was as soon as too overwhelmed to reply and did no longer ogle him. In their 2nd name, when Lee inquired about the new burial spot, the daddy declined to portion the positioning. He made a 3rd name after receiving a message questioning why he had contacted the family for the period of the mourning period.

Lee clarified that his diagram was as soon as no longer to utter on the matter nonetheless to certain up any misunderstandings.

Moreover, Lee Jin Ho furthermore addressed accusations that his YouTube movies had contributed to Kim Sae Ron’s struggles, stressing that he had on no tale supposed to damage her reputation or smartly-being.

He stated, “Here is a calm matter, as I on no tale supposed to reason damage to the deceased. In February 2024, I met with two of Kim Sae Ron’s managers and discussed methods to make stronger her return to the entertainment enterprise. Given the severe public backlash in opposition to her, we agreed to fastidiously assess the subject earlier than addressing it in any deliver. Primarily, we remained in cease conversation all around the production of my movies.”

He pointed out that, whereas thoroughly different media retail outlets aggressively covered her controversies, including her DUI incident, struggles with debt, and fallout from her unbiased in Bloodhounds, his channel had been comparatively restrained. Lee Jin Ho emphasised that, in contrast to completely different media retail outlets that produced hundreds of articles about Kim Sae Ron, his channel had supreme covered her four times throughout the final three years.

Primarily based mostly on Lee, these choices were constituted of appreciate for Kim Sae Ron and an working out of the out of the ordinary scrutiny she was as soon as under.

Even though Lee Jin Ho strongly denied any wrongdoing, he concluded his assertion with an apology to Kim Sae Ron’s family. He acknowledged that, no matter his intent, the renewed focal point on the actress’ identify had precipitated additional damage. “No matter my intentions, the true fact that the deceased’s identify has been brought up again on tale of me is something I deeply impart regret for to the bereaved family,” he expressed. He furthermore issued a plea to the media, urging them to tackle experiences about Kim Sae Ron’s passing with sensitivity and warning.

The controversy was as soon as before the entirety reignited when Ilgan Sports printed an interview with Kim Sae Ron’s father, by which he overtly condemned Lee Jin Ho and thoroughly different on-line figures for what he described as irresponsible and detrimental protection. Kim Sae Ron’s father’s words resonated with many netizens, sparking heated debates about the unbiased of YouTubers and on-line media in celebrities’ private struggles. Per the backlash, Lee Jin Ho took down all movies related to Kim Sae Ron from his YouTube channel. Whereas this transfer could perchance presumably had been an strive to de-escalate the subject, it has no longer silenced criticism fully.