Home Korean News Kim Soo Hyun Vs Kim Sae Ron: From AI voice recording to fabricated texts; 4 evidence labeled ‘fake’ by GOLDMEDALIST

Kim Soo Hyun Vs Kim Sae Ron: From AI voice recording to fabricated texts; 4 evidence labeled ‘fake’ by GOLDMEDALIST

by Liza Terry
Kim Soo Hyun Vs Kim Sae Ron: From AI voice recording to fabricated texts; 4 evidence labeled ‘fake’ by GOLDMEDALIST

Kim Soo Hyun Vs Kim Sae Ron: From AI voice recording to fabricated texts; 4 evidence labeled ‘fake’ by GOLDMEDALIST

From a ‘untrue’ AI converse to fabricated texts, 4 claims by Garosero were labeled ‘false proof’ by Kim Soo Hyun’s agency, GOLDMEDALIST.

Kim Soo Hyun (L), Kim Sae Ron (R): Credits TvN and Kim Sae Ron Loyal
Kim Soo Hyun (L), Kim Sae Ron (R): Credits TvN and Kim Sae Ron Loyal

The scandal appealing Kim Soo Hyun and Kim Sae Ron has unfolded into notion to be one of potentially the most controversial celeb sagas in South Korea. But on the guts of the chaos lies a heated encourage-and-forth between Garosero Be taught Institute (on the whole identified as Hoverlab) and Kim Soo Hyun’s agency, GOLDMEDALIST.

Garosero has supplied a chain of allegations and “proof”. These allegations encompass audio recordings, KakaoTalk messages, watch testimonies, and photos.

On the opposite hand, GOLDMEDALIST has strongly refuted every single portion of proof, calling them both fabricated, AI-generated, or outright unsuitable. Right here’s a breakdown of each claim made by Garosero, and how Kim Soo Hyun’s agency has replied by labeling them all as “untrue”.

1. The “AI-Generated” Advise Recording of Kim Sae Ron

Garosero’s first indispensable portion of “proof” used to be an audio recording, allegedly featuring Kim Sae Ron speaking to an acquaintance on January 10, 2025. In this recording, she reportedly confessed to having had a sexual relationship with Kim Soo Hyun on the age of 14.

This claim used to be particularly explosive and instantly made headlines. But GOLDMEDALIST wasted no time in refuting it, releasing a public observation: “Garosero claimed they had bought an audio recording of the gradual actress Kim Sae Ron. On the opposite hand, the recordings were solid entirely, and Gold Medalist believes that the audio files were created using AI technology.”

They emphasized that the tone, cadence, and linguistic patterns within the recording weren’t in maintaining with Kim Sae Ron’s proper converse. Furthermore, additionally they accused Garosero of manipulating public sentiment with deepfake audio.

2. Injuries of the Informant: Staged or Stolen?

Of their 2d press conference, Garosero supplied one more dramatic twist: the informant who had allegedly supplied the audio recording used to be mentioned to savor been physically assaulted. Photos were exhibited to negate bruises and wounds, supposedly as proof that any individual wished to silence the whistleblower. All over all over again, GOLDMEDALIST called sinister, questioning the authenticity of the accidents and the photos.

Their observation read: “Garo Sero’s false claims are unacceptable and defy frequent sense. The photos confirmed as proof can with out concerns be stumbled on on-line with an easy search. These photos were both taken from the get or manipulated to fit their epic.”  GOLDMEDALIST went to this point as to name the informant a “fraudster,” accusing Garosero of cooperating with those who don’t savor any credibility.

3. KakaoTalk Conversations: Forensically Disputed

Most likely potentially the most emotionally charged section of this case revolves around the alleged KakaoTalk messages between Kim Soo Hyun and Kim Sae Ron. These messages, printed by Kim Sae Ron’s family by strategy of Garosero, were supplied as gross proof of a cease, presumably romantic, relationship between the two when she used to be peaceable a minor.

Within the future of his press conference on March 31, 2025, Kim Soo Hyun firmly denied the authenticity of these messages and printed he had taken forensic motion to disprove them.

“To negate this, I submitted the full linked messages — in conjunction with the 2016 and 2018 chats supplied by the family, apart from to my savor most modern chats with acquaintances — to a scientific forensic establishment for analysis. The cease consequence: The establishment concluded that the person within the 2016 messages will not be the same as the one within the 2018 messages.”

This forensic discrepancy led Kim Soo Hyun to reveal the messages tampered with and even totally fabricated.

4. The “Kissing” Photos: Doctored or Misrepresented?

To solidify the claim that Kim Soo Hyun and Kim Sae Ron had an substandard relationship, Garosero and a lot of other on-line sources (particularly The Qoo) circulated photos allegedly displaying Kim Soo Hyun kissing Kim Sae Ron on the cheek. Some photos perceived to be taken in non-public settings, in conjunction with inside of an elevator and in dressing rooms. These photos fueled rumors that the two were romantically involved proper thru her teenage years.

On the opposite hand, GOLDMEDALIST pushed encourage all over again: “These photos are baseless, deceptive, and manipulated. Some photos savor clearly been edited, whereas others were taken out of context. There may well be not any photographic proof of any unlawful or putrid relationship.” The agency has also requested proper motion against individuals and media outlets mad by spreading these photos with out verification.

A Battle of Narratives, But Who Holds the Truth?

From AI-generated audio to staged damage photos, solid messages, and doctored photos, Kim Soo Hyun’s agency has worked tirelessly to discredit every portion of proof supplied by Garosero.

The quiz now will not be honest concerning the allegations, but about accountability for spreading misinformation. If Garosero’s proof is certainly fabricated, as GOLDMEDALIST insists, it may well possibly consequence in chaos. On the opposite hand, if these so-called ‘untrue’ objects of proof flip out to be honest, it may well possibly originate up a utterly new spectrum of controversy.

Source credit : pinkvilla

Related News