Min Hee Jin vs LE SSERAFIM’s agency: June hearing gets scheduled for KakaoTalk messages’ validity as evidence amid NewJeans row
Min Hee Jin's aspect questioned the greatest admissibility of Source Song obtaining KakaoTalk messages, resulting in scheduling of a separate listening to for the an identical. Know more.

Source Song filed a 500 million KRW damages lawsuit against susceptible ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin. Its 2nd listening to took quandary on May maybe maybe 30, Friday, all the draw by when the agency used to be house to most modern some crucial ‘proof’ of the case, that involved textual recount messages. On the opposite hand, Min Hee Jin’s aspect alleged the messages to be illegally received. Hence, the court ordered a separate listening to to envision its finest validity, as reported by Ok-media outlet Sports Lately.
Min Hee Jin’s stance in the Source Song case
LE SSERAFIM’s value, Source Song, used to be ready to most modern a 20-minute showcase of documents supporting their claims. On the opposite hand, Min Hee Jin’s finest e book raised an objection, arguing that the KakaoTalk messages integrated in the presentation offers had been received without impartial authorization. Thus, as per the defendant, the texts must no longer be understanding of as proof.
ADOR refuted it by claiming that the messages had been legally received and ragged in previous trials. Elaborating their enlighten, Min Hee Jin’s workforce acknowledged, “What worries us most is that the presentation might additionally admire message excerpts associated to the disputed incident.” Additionally, her finest counsel also submitted a formal demand for the trial to be held in a closed session, some distance from public scrutiny.
Court docket decision on Min Hee Jin’s demand
The 12th Civil Division of the Seoul Western District Court docket acknowledged the susceptible ADOR CEO’s concerns relating to the greatest admissibility of the KakaoTalk messages, nevertheless they denied the 2nd demand of a closed session. The decide’s ruling mentioned, “We can proceed with a public listening to, nevertheless will restrict any dialogue or exhibit of the explicit KakaoTalk excerpts the defendant contests till further overview.”
Upon listening to each and every events’ arguments, the court determined to retain a separate listening to on June 27 to assess the legitimacy of the KakaoTalk proof.
About Min Hee Jin vs Source Song case
Min Hee Jin claimed in a press convention that HYBE firstly deliberate to debut NewJeans as their first lady neighborhood nevertheless as a replace selected to begin LE SSERAFIM first. She also alleged that HYBE later tiny NewJeans’ promotional actions and favoured LE SSERAFIM. The dispute further involved Min Hee Jin’s disagreements over the casting and training direction of for NewJeans with HYBE
Source credit : pinkvilla