Home Korean News NewJeans vs ADOR: NJZ files objection to court ruling blocking independent activities; retrial set to follow

NewJeans vs ADOR: NJZ files objection to court ruling blocking independent activities; retrial set to follow

by Liza Terry
Kim Soo Hyun denies 5 evidences of dating minor Kim Sae Ron: From butt n*ked rendezvous to ski trip selfie

NewJeans vs ADOR: NJZ files objection to court ruling blocking independent activities; retrial set to follow

NewJeans (NJZ) recordsdata an objection to the court docket ruling that blocks self sustaining actions, now not easy ADOR's take care of watch over over the group.

NJZ: Courtesy of NewJeans Twitter
NJZ: Courtesy of NewJeans Twitter

NJZ (formerly identified as NewJeans) has formally filed an objection to a court docket ruling that upheld an injunction requested by their agency, ADOR, as per NewsView. This injunction prohibits the group from taking fragment in self sustaining actions, in conjunction with signing promoting contracts outdoors of their contract with ADOR. The decision, made by the Seoul Central District Court on March 21, 2025, sided with ADOR, a subsidiary of the worldwide entertainment extensive HYBE.

The court docket’s ruling objectives to take care of ADOR’s take care of watch over over the group and restrict their skill to have interaction in actions independently. As the group people of NJZ filed an objection, now the Seoul court docket has to location up a retrial to resolve this subject.

The court docket’s decision to aspect with ADOR used to be in step with the finding that NewJeans did now not provide sufficient evidence to existing that the agency had violated the terms of their odd contract. The ruling confirmed ADOR’s impartial because the odd agency for NewJeans, stopping the group from taking on self sustaining projects. Per the Seoul court docket, the materials submitted by the Good ample-Pop all-lady group did now not conclusively state that ADOR had failed to meet their contractual responsibilities.

Fixed with this, NewJeans made a observation by their social media channels. The group announced their intent to dispute the court docket’s decision, revealing their plans to file an objection and post extra supporting materials. They expressed their possibility to continue combating for their skill to have interaction in self sustaining actions and offer protection to their educated freedom.

This lawful dispute has sparked indispensable debate within the Good ample-pop entertainment industry and among netizens. The case has even drawn reactions from outstanding figures in South Korea’s song associations. Choi Kwang Ho, secretary total of the KMCA (Korea Music Advise Association), criticized NJZ, suggesting that whereas disputes between artists and their companies are now not odd, they want to in any respect times be addressed within the boundaries of the contract. He wired that such points must be resolved in step with democratic principles and can objective now not straggle previous- the Global media.

With NewJeans now formally submitting their objection, each and each parties (the Workforce and ADOR) can procure the opportunity to display conceal extra evidence and arguments. The discontinuance end result of this dispute can procure far-reaching implications for how Good ample-pop companies and artists navigate their contractual relationships, namely by manner of balancing agency take care of watch over and artist independence.

Additionally Be taught

NewJeans vs ADOR: Korean Music Associations warns NJZ to now not produce court docket ruling 'a national disaster'

NewJeans vs ADOR: Korean Music Associations warns NJZ to now not produce court docket ruling ‘a national disaster’

Source credit : pinkvilla

Related News