NewJeans claims ADOR’s ‘harassment’ seeks total ban on entertainment activities of NJZ, including song production

NJZ, beforehand identified as NewJeans, has released a brand fresh assertion on March 6, 2025, addressing the ongoing unbiased strive in opposition to with their worn company, ADOR. The community reiterated their plight on the dispute, shedding light on what they portray as an strive by ADOR to suppress their careers thru unbiased methodology.

In accordance with NJZ, their contractual relationship with ADOR change into once legally severed on November 29, 2024, after the company allegedly did not fulfill its responsibilities as a management firm. Despite this, ADOR has persisted to vow preserve watch over over the community, filing an injunction on January 6, 2025, inquiring for that the court formally peep them as NJZ’s management firm.

Firstly, ADOR framed its unbiased motion as an effort to prevent NJZ from lively in advertisement actions. On the other hand, the community claims that the company’s valid intent goes some distance beyond limiting commercials. NJZ accused ADOR of actively working to total their leisure profession entirely, with their unbiased filings reflecting this broader unbiased. “Whereas ADOR insists that their intentions are to prevent the confusion of fans and advertisers, if truth be told, they’re seeking to prohibit all of NJZ’s leisure actions,” they stated in their assertion, as quoted by AllKpop.

The community extra alleged that on February 11, 2025, ADOR expanded the scope of its injunction, seeking to prohibit them from participating in key leisure actions comparable to songwriting, composing, performing, and singing. NJZ views this escalation as a staunch away attack on their ingenious freedom, arguing that ADOR’s final purpose is to dam them from working in the industry altogether. “Somehow, ADOR’s injunction change into once filed from the inspiration with the intent of fully halting NJZ’s profession.”

Of their assertion, NJZ also pointed to a sample of interference from both ADOR and its mother or father firm, HYBE. The community claimed that ADOR’s expanded injunction quiz came straight after HYBE Chairman Bang Si Hyuk allegedly forced tournament organizers at Complicated Con to exclude them. NJZ urged that ADOR’s unbiased transfer change into once a retaliatory response following the failure of those efforts to dam their participation.

Furthermore, NJZ criticized ADOR for putting forward a deceptive public story concerning the scenario. Whereas the company had beforehand acknowledged NJZ’s unbiased actions, that they had concurrently pursued unbiased motion to prevent those very actions from persevering with. The community accused ADOR of concealing its unbiased intentions, presenting the lawsuit as a measure to prevent confusion among fans and advertisers, when if truth be told, it change into once allegedly an are trying and command NJZ’s profession to a standstill.

The community’s assertion also highlighted their long-standing grievances in opposition to both ADOR and HYBE, describing a historical past of mistreatment that began sooner than their contract termination. NJZ particularly referenced their Tokyo Dome fan assembly in June 2023, after which HYBE allegedly attempted to position their actions on preserve indefinitely, the usage of an “prolonged vacation” as justification.

As smartly as to sidelining the community, NJZ claimed that HYBE worked at the abet of the scenes to diminish their achievements, allegedly making negative remarks to journalists in an are trying and downplay their success. The community printed that while they in the inspiration chose to preserve silent, the ongoing attempts to discredit them and block their profession progression maintain forced them to talk out.

Despite being below ADOR’s management at the time, NJZ alleged that the company did not provide protection to them. In its build, ADOR reportedly aligned itself with HYBE, disregarding NJZ’s repeated requests for intervention and failing to meet the job plans in the beginning outlined for 2024. These unresolved issues indirectly resulted in sizable damages to the community, extra contributing to their decision to discontinuance their contracts.

NJZ maintains that their termination of contracts change into once legally justified, following all unbiased unbiased procedures and industry requirements. On the other hand, no topic the dissolution of their inviting contracts, the community claimed that ADOR has persisted to interfere with their respectable endeavors, disrupting advertisement deals and visa-linked matters so as to hinder their actions. “Our termination seek files from change into once essentially essentially essentially based on present processes of inviting contract laws and responsibilities, following identical outdated unbiased procedures. Due to this truth, ADOR’s claims that our unbiased actions are illegal or depraved are entirely deceptive.”

The community emphasised that they made just a few attempts to address their grievances sooner than picking to transfer away ADOR, together with tense corrective measures. When ADOR allegedly neglected these requests, NJZ felt that they had no substitute but to legally cut ties with the company. They extra argued that any inviting contract is constructed on trust, which, in their case, had been fully broken consequently of ADOR’s repeated breaches. In accordance with NJZ, final below ADOR’s management would no longer most effective be detrimental to their respectable careers but would also topic them to excessive mental hurt.

NJZ strongly condemned ADOR’s persisted unbiased maneuvers, accusing the company of deliberately obstructing their careers thru assorted tactics. They labeled these actions as one-sided harassment, pointing out that “We want to invent it determined that their actions quantity to 1-sided harassment, no topic the truth that our inviting contracts were terminated on legitimate grounds.”

Because the unbiased strive in opposition to continues, NJZ has vowed to strive in opposition to for his or her rights and elaborate the legitimacy of their contract termination in court. The community ended their assertion by expressing hope that no other artists ought to suffer the identical mistreatment they’ve confronted.