Podcaster accuses BLACKPINK’s Jennie of filming explicit video with billionaire heir, fans demand legal action in her defence

BLACKPINK’s Jennie has found herself at the guts of a brewing controversy. Her name used to be impulsively mentioned in a widely circulated podcast episode. The podcast, Above The Have an effect on, fair no longer too prolonged ago launched a section that has sparked outrage across social media platforms. It is attributable to a series of severe, unverified accusations made against female K-pop idols, with Jennie singled out in a single in all the more explosive claims.

The episode featured a customer identified as Kira, an entrepreneur and online personality. She initially discussed her deepest experiences and dating life. The dialog escalated when she alleged that some female K-pop idols private been fascinated with illicit preparations with extremely effective and filthy rich businessmen. Kira insinuated that such actions weren’t outlandish within the alternate, suggesting a troubling underside to the glamorous world of K-pop.

Jennie dragged into scandal

Alternatively, the pickle intensified when one in all the podcast’s co-hosts, who goes by the name Woohak, inserted himself into the discussion. He shared an especially inflammatory myth. In step with Woohak, he once attended a summer season camp with a boy he claimed used to be the son of a BMW heir. He then alleged that this individual paid to private s*xual members of the family with Jennie from BLACKPINK. Most disturbingly, Woohak claimed that he had considered a video that supposedly served as “proof” of the encounter.

Although the co-host did no longer provide any staunch evidence, and no such photos has surfaced publicly, the allegations spread impulsively online. The ticket of the BMW heir extra demanding the subject, as speculation grew over which member of the family he used to be referencing. Notably, BMW heiress Susanne Klatten has teenagers around Woohak’s age, though no protest hyperlinks private been established, and no identities private been confirmed.

Followers’ response to the allegations

The podcast’s statements had been met with swift and popular backlash. Followers and even casual listeners expressed their disgust over the reckless nature of the claims, seriously given your whole lack of substantiation. Many criticized the hosts for undertaking defamatory speculation and for exploiting a public resolve’s name for shock payment and a focus.

Social media platforms had been quickly flooded with calls for accountability, with many urging Jennie and her agency to rob decisive factual action. Supporters emphasised the aptitude psychological damage such rumors would possibly maybe presumably reason. They are saying that no celeb, no subject reputation, would possibly maybe presumably amassed be subjected to this stage of public persona assassination with out .

As of the time of writing, neither Jennie nor her agency has issued a proper response. Alternatively, the persevered spread of the podcast clip and the rising public demand for accountability imply that a response would be impending.