Shin Se Kyung wins defamation case, court orders convict 8-month prison sentence for threatening actress

The Bride of Habaek standing Shin Se Kyung was subjected to malicious feedback and threats from a 35-year-extinct girl, for months. Following that, she filed a defamation case and as per the most modern updates by the Ok-media outlet OSEN, the courtroom ruled in her establish on. On July 4, it was reported that the culprit was handed a penal complex sentence. The courtroom’s dedication highlights the severity of cyberbullying and on-line harassment.

Shin Se Kyung’s defamer ordered an 8-month jail sentence

The Seoul Eastern District Court docket sentenced the defendant, incessantly known as Kim, to eight months in jail on the charges of intimidation and defamation. The courtroom found Kim responsible of posting around 450 threatening and insulting feedback on-line, including references to an ac*d att*ck, which prompted famous psychological trauma to the Bustle On actress.

The feedback had been posted on several fan boards of the actress and diversified drama-linked boards on the web online page DC Inside of. In accordance with that, the courtroom offered its dedication. It highlighted the gravity of cases keen on-line harassment, critically focusing on public figures. Shriek Lee Ho Dong emphasized that despite no accurate intent to enact the threats, the nature of the messages constituted a famous offense.

Prosecutor beforehand requested 2 years detention of convict

Kim was confirmed responsible of the charges levied against her within the old ruling of the defamation case. Following that, the prosecutor demanded a 2-year jail sentence for the accused. The courtroom heard every side and shifted the verdict to any other day. On June 2, the last ruling of a 8-month sentence was made.

The courtroom’s leniency within the sentencing was influenced by the truth that Kim did now not appear to personal any accurate map of inflicting physical hurt on Shin Se Kyung, despite the threatening nature of her messages. Her company gave the impression happy with the verdict and did now not appeal for a harsher sentence.

On the assorted hand, they talked about that freedom of expression doesn’t define hiding within the aid of anonymity to threaten anyone’s lifestyles. Thus, the ruling served as a famous precedent in addressing cyber violence, underscoring that celebrities had been entitled to the identical protection of their personal rights as fresh electorate. The courtroom’s dedication also aimed to discourage identical crimes in due course.