Song Ha Yoon’s accuser asks actress to stop ‘manipulating public,’ reveals reason for not answering police summons

A girl is named Ms Oh has issued a lengthy rebuttal after actress Music Ha Yoon’s authorized team filed a complaint in opposition to her. She beforehand accused the actress of faculty bullying.

Background of the controversy

On July 2, Music Ha Yoon’s authorized team printed that the actress had officially filed a prison complaint in opposition to Ms Oh. The authorized representatives acknowledged that Music had light diversified forms of evidence within the previous yr to scenario the claims. The actress had submitted them to the police. The case, which first surfaced in 2024, gained renewed consideration following this authorized transfer.

Ms Oh breaks silence

At the moment after news of the complaint emerged, Ms Oh issued an huge inform on an on-line community. This marks her first public response in over a yr.

Identifying herself as a U.S. citizen of Korean descent, she acknowledged that she had already submitted a written inform to the Korean authorities, alongside with a duplicate of her passport. Contrary to reviews, she denied refusing to cooperate with police and clarified that she has no longer been positioned on any wished checklist.

Clarifies her authorized and citizenship role

She also addressed the confusion over her nationality. Ms Oh outlined that though she has received U.S. citizenship, her Korean citizenship stays intact for administrative comfort. Or no longer it’s because the strategy of renouncing it’s no longer computerized.

She emphasized that this had no bearing on the authorized dispute. Ms Oh also illustrious that she has been residing within the U.S. since 2017 and has no longer returned to Korea since then.

Explains refusal to appear in person

She pushed aid in opposition to criticism that she did no longer seem in Korea for questioning. Essentially based on Ms Oh, the expectation to shuttle in one other country at her non-public expense, no subject being the alleged sufferer, is “excessive and unreasonable.”

She acknowledged that she has already offered ample written evidence and stays reachable for further communication. Forcing her to appear physically, she argued, would infringe on her authorized rights.

Denies reviews of being ‘Wanted’

Ms Oh also took subject with claims that she had been designated as a “wished” person. She stressed that no such official label had been communicated to her. She claimed that the investigation had easiest been rapidly suspended, no longer escalated to contain shuttle bans or warrants.

“Therefore, the relate that I am on one of these checklist is exaggerated or incorrect,” she acknowledged.

Questions Music Ha Yoon’s college transfer

One of many core arguments Ms Oh provided used to be concerning Music Ha Yoon’s college history. She outlined, “I’d fancy to elaborate that Banpo High Faculty and Gujeong High Faculty belong to the the same college district, making a typical transfer between them no longer most likely. If no longer for a disciplinary action such as college violence, one of these transfer also can no longer non-public taken living.”

She mentioned this supports her allegation that Music’s transfer used to be a results of misconduct, rather than a non-public various.

Reasserts her claims are fair

Ms Oh reiterated that the occasions she described, particularly bodily assaults by Music, had been shared publicly on JTBC’s Crime Chief. The claims were verified by this system’s producers. She argued that her statements were “relevant and fair,” and fell within her honest to protect herself publicly.

Plans for authorized action

In conclusion, Ms Oh printed that she is currently in talks with a Korean regulations company and making ready to take civil and prison action if notable. She criticized, “I imagine that Music Ha Yoon is utilizing this case to quilt up her non-public previous misconduct and to shift the blame onto me.”

“I strongly flee Music Ha Yoon and her representatives to directly end making excessive authorized threats and manipulating public opinion,” she acknowledged. She vows to provide protection to her rights and advise more as the case progresses.