IU wins 30 million KRW lawsuit against accuser over false plagiarism claims; Know more

IU has sooner or later gained the lawsuit she filed against an particular person that falsely accused her of copyright infringements in six of her songs. The accuser has been ordered by the courtroom to pay the singer a whopping sum of 30 million KRW. This ruling comes more than a 365 days after the K-pop idol began her correct fight against the person.

In conserving with updates on December 19, the Seoul Central District Court docket’s Twenty ninth Civil Division held a sentencing listening to for the lawsuit IU filed against an particular person. The courtroom dominated in her decide on and ordered defendant A to pay 30 million KRW in damages for falsely accusing the singer of plagiarism.

The case began in Could also 2023, when the actual person accused the K-pop soloist of copyright infringement in six of her songs, together with Valuable person, The Red Sneakers, Ultimate Day, Bbibbi, and more. The singer in my thought participated in the composition of supreme one of those six tracks and produced the heaps of. Therefore, the claims effectively became defamatory. The police launched an investigation into the matter and disregarded defendant A’s claims in August 2023. A month later, IU, with the encourage of her agency and correct crew, filed a damages lawsuit against the accuser.

In conserving with the reviews, defendant A, who is currently residing in the USA, did no longer appear at essentially the most indispensable listening to held in July 2024. Despite the efforts of the soloist’s correct crew, the person remained unresponsive. Then the courtroom accredited IU’s question to proceed with the trial being conducted by a public test. It’s some distance a design by which the relevant paperwork are kept on the courtroom as the addresses of the events are unknown or provide turns into no longer probably. The aim is additionally posted on the bulletin board so it is regarded as that the philosophize material has been dropped on the events.

On the replacement hand, even sooner than the sentencing on December 18, the whereabouts of defendant A were unknown, so the courtroom had no replacement but to rule in decide on of IU per the claims and proof submitted.

Other than this lawsuit, IU’s agency, EDAM Leisure, has taken correct movement against 180 folk in many situations, together with but no longer exiguous to cyberbullying, untrue accusations of plagiarism, production and circulation of deepfake philosophize material, and more.